INDUSTRY

Payment Fraud Prevention for Government

Local councils, state departments, and federal agencies process massive payment volumes to contractors, suppliers, and grant recipients. When public money is lost to fraud, the consequences are financial, reputational, and political.

$152.6M lost to redirection scams (2024)

$55K avg loss per BEC incident

Public accountability & FOI exposure

Sources: ACCC Scamwatch 2024, ASD FY2023-24

Why government agencies are targeted

Government agencies at every level process significant volumes of payments. Local councils pay contractors, maintenance providers, and community organisations. State departments fund infrastructure projects, health services, and education. Federal agencies disburse grants, defence contracts, and social services payments. Each payment is an opportunity for fraud.

The scale creates exposure. A large council might process thousands of supplier payments each month. A state department might manage hundreds of active contracts. At this volume, manually verifying every bank detail change is impractical. Teams rely on email confirmations, phone callbacks, and trust, which are the same vulnerabilities that business email compromise and payment redirection fraud exploit in every industry.

Government procurement rules are strict but often focused on who you can pay rather than verifying the bank account belongs to that entity. A supplier might pass every procurement check and still have their bank details intercepted by a scammer after the contract is awarded. The procurement system catches non-compliance. It does not catch fraud.

Public accountability adds another dimension. When a private company loses money to fraud, it is a commercial matter. When a government agency loses public money, it is a media story, an Auditor-General finding, and a political problem. FOI exposure means fraud incidents can become public record, amplifying the reputational damage.

Common fraud scenarios in government

These attack patterns target the specific way government agencies process payments. Each one exploits a real characteristic of how public sector procurement and payment systems operate.

Contractor bank detail change

A scammer impersonates an existing contractor and sends 'updated bank details' to the agency's accounts payable team. The contractor's ABN and invoice format are correct because they are publicly available through procurement records. The only change is the BSB and account number. The next payment goes to the scammer's account.

Grant payment redirection

Grant recipients provide bank details when their application is approved. A scammer compromises the recipient's email and sends updated bank details to the granting agency before the funds are disbursed. The grant payment goes to the fraudulent account. The real recipient does not know until they chase up the missing funds.

Supplier impersonation

A scammer creates an email address that closely mimics a real supplier (using a different domain or slight spelling variation) and sends an invoice with fraudulent bank details. In high-volume accounts payable environments, the subtle difference goes unnoticed. The invoice gets paid to the wrong account.

Procurement fraud

A fraudulent entity submits a legitimate-looking tender or quote with a real ABN. The ABN exists on the Australian Business Register, but the bank account does not belong to the ABN holder. Without verifying bank account ownership, the agency awards the contract and pays the scammer.

Public accountability and audit requirements

Government agencies operate under a level of scrutiny that private businesses do not. Auditor-General reviews, parliamentary committees, FOI requests, and media enquiries all create accountability that makes fraud incidents significantly more damaging than the financial loss alone.

When an audit reveals that public money was lost to fraud, the first question is always: what controls were in place? If the answer is "we relied on email confirmations and phone calls," the agency faces criticism for inadequate processes. If the answer is "we verified the payee's identity, business registration, and bank account ownership before every payment, and here is the audit trail," the conversation is very different.

The audit trail matters as much as the prevention. Government agencies need to demonstrate not just that verification happened, but what was checked, when, and what the result was. A tamper-proof, exportable audit trail that exists independently of the payment system provides this evidence without relying on manual record-keeping.

This is particularly important for agencies subject to the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act (PGPA) and equivalent state legislation, which require proper use and management of public resources. Automated payment verification is a direct response to these obligations.

How ezyshield protects government payments

ezyshield verifies the person, the business, and the bank account before any payment is processed. Every contractor, supplier, and grant recipient. Every payment run.

Verify every payee

Biometric identity verification, ABN/ASIC validation, and live bank account ownership checks for every contractor, supplier, and grant recipient. Works at any volume.

Re-verify every payment

Before every payment run, ezyshield re-checks all payee details. If a contractor's bank details have changed, payment is blocked until re-verified through the full flow.

Audit-ready evidence

Tamper-proof audit trail for every verification. Exportable for Auditor-General reviews, FOI requests, internal audits, and compliance reporting. Independent of your payment system.

See How ezyshield Works

Why automated verification for government

Government payment environments create challenges that manual verification cannot solve at scale.

Handles volume without delay

Automated verification processes thousands of payees without bottlenecks. No delays to payment runs, no shortcuts under pressure, no reliance on manual phone calls.

Consistent across teams

Every payee receives the same verification regardless of which team or officer processes the payment. No variation in standards across departments, branches, or staff members.

Reduces insider risk

Automated verification removes the ability for a single officer to approve a bank detail change without independent confirmation. The system verifies. People do not need to trust people.

Built for accountability

The tamper-proof audit trail provides the evidence trail that auditors, oversight bodies, and the public expect. Every verification is documented, timestamped, and exportable.

Frequently asked questions

Why are government agencies targeted for payment fraud?

Government agencies process high volumes of payments to contractors, suppliers, and grant recipients. Payment processes are often manual or legacy, with large teams processing bank detail changes. The combination of volume, value, and process complexity creates multiple opportunities for fraud. Public accountability also makes government a more attractive target for organised scammers.

What types of payment fraud affect government most?

The most common types are payment redirection fraud (where a scammer impersonates a contractor or supplier and submits fraudulent bank details), fake invoice scams (where fraudulent invoices are submitted for payment), and grant payment redirection (where funds intended for a legitimate recipient are diverted to a fraudulent account).

Can ezyshield handle the volume of payments government agencies process?

Yes. ezyshield is built for high-volume payment environments. The platform handles verification at scale, re-checking every payee before every payment run. Whether an agency processes hundreds or thousands of payments per month, the verification is automated and consistent.

How does ezyshield support audit requirements?

Every verification generates a tamper-proof audit record showing what was checked, when, and the result. These records are exportable for internal audits, Auditor-General reviews, FOI requests, and compliance reporting. The audit trail exists independently of your payment system.

Does ezyshield work with existing government procurement systems?

ezyshield operates as a verification layer that sits alongside your existing procurement and payment systems. It does not replace your ERP or procurement platform. It adds the verification step that those systems are missing: confirming that the bank account belongs to the entity you intend to pay.

Protect public money from payment fraud

Every contractor, supplier, and grant payment is verified before money moves. Tamper-proof audit trail for accountability and compliance.

Book a Demo View Pricing